This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
Implementation K1
PIDInst
Use Case 1: GEOMAR
Status
Sure — here is the PIDInst summary in the same style:
PIDInst identifiers for instruments are currently not captured at GEOMAR
- There is no established process or system in place for assigning or managing PIDInst identifiers
- Potential responsibility is unclear, but likely involves technical and data management staff (e.g. Claas and others)
- There are currently no documented workflows or institutional guidelines for PIDInst usage
* A key challenge is the lack of initial implementation and system integration * This includes missing connections to:
- Instrument registries
- Internal systems (e.g. OSIS or repositories)
Outlook
Establishing a clear responsibility structure, workflows, and technical integration is a necessary first step toward implementation.
Use Case 2: Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam (GFZ)
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 3: Helmholtzzentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)
Implementation Group ORCID:
HMC: Andrea, Manu
UFZ: Johann, Ronny
What is the current status in capturing PIDs? Who is responsible for ORCID?
What tools do we need or are involved?
What are the next steps?
Use Case 4: KIT
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 5: Hereon
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 6: AWI
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 7: FZJ
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?