This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
Implementation K1
IGSN
Use Case 1: GEOMAR
Status
IGSN identifiers for samples are already captured at GEOMAR, but not yet in a fully systematic way
- Capture is currently manual
- IGSNs are managed via dedicated sample systems, e.g.: [https://biosamples.geomar.de](https://biosamples.geomar.de)
Responsibility
- Geosamples: Core Repositoryx Management
- Biosamples: Bio Sample Management, Data Managemement
There are currently no documented workflows or institutional guidelines for IGSN usage.
A key development is the ongoing implementation of API-based registration for IGSNs.
A major challenge is the unclear integration into central systems, particularly:
- Whether and how IGSNs will be exposed in OSIS applications
- Improving automation (via API)
Outlook
System integration is an important step toward a more scalable and harmonized IGSN implementation. We strive to work with the core and biosample repositories to develop proper workflows to capture and store IGDN within GEOMAR data systems.
Use Case 2: Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam (GFZ)
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 3: Helmholtzzentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)
Implementation Group ORCID:
HMC: Andrea, Manu
UFZ: Johann, Ronny
What is the current status in capturing PIDs? Who is responsible for ORCID?
What tools do we need or are involved?
What are the next steps?
Use Case 4: KIT
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 5: Hereon
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 6: AWI
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?
Use Case 7: FZJ
What is the current status?
Where shall we go?