This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
Recommendation 4.2
Recommendation to Sample curators to train staff in handling IGSN
Description
Status:
Motivation for this Recommendation:
Sample curators are well-positioned to take a leading role in promoting the use of IGSNs, as they possess the expertise and oversight necessary to ensure high-quality sample documentation. By actively encouraging and training researchers, technicians, and other staff to register IGSNs and record sample relationships, curators help establish consistent practices across projects and departments. This not only reduces the risk of metadata loss or inconsistency but also strengthens the traceability and reproducibility of research. Empowering a broader group of staff to apply IGSNs correctly supports long-term stewardship of sample records and ensures that sample-based data can be reliably reused, cited, and linked to other research outputs.
Recommendation
It is recommended, that sample curators:
- Enable, train and encourage staff, including researchers, technicians, and other people who take samples, split samples or create subsamples to register IGSN to be able to identify these samples where appropriate.
- Enable, train and encourage staff, including researchers, technicians, and other people who split samples or create other types of subsamples to record any parent IGSNs with these subsamples.
To answer - Who exactly are sample curators? Where to do this?
Binding Convention:
mandatory | conditional | optional | |
---|---|---|---|
Helmholtz FAIR Principle |
Precondition for Implementation:
Related Recommendations
Parent:
Dependent:
Other: none
Contributors
Names of contributors to this recommendation
Content
1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation
About
History and structure
Current Use of …
Motivation
2. Possible alternative solutions
3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation
(quality of content, limitations, interoperability, sustainability: expected future dissemination / technical availability / funding)
4. The Recommendation
[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]