** Implementation K1**

====== PIDInst ======

====Use Case 1: GEOMAR ====

__Status__ 

PIDInst identifiers for instruments are currently not captured at GEOMAR
  * There is no established process or system in place for assigning or managing PIDInst identifiers
  * Potential responsibility is unclear, but likely involves technical and data management staff (e.g. Claas and others)
  * There are currently no documented workflows or institutional guidelines for PIDInst usage
A key challenge is the lack of initial implementation and system integration. This includes missing connections to:
  * Instrument registries
  * Internal systems (e.g. OSIS or repositories)

__Outlook__

Establishing a clear responsibility structure, workflows, and technical integration is a necessary first step toward implementation.






==== Use Case 2: Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam (GFZ) ====

What is the current status?

Where shall we go?




==== Use Case 3: Helmholtzzentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) ====

Implementation Group ORCID:

HMC: Andrea, Manu

UFZ: Johann, Ronny

What is the current status in capturing PIDs?
Who is responsible for ORCID?

What tools do we need or are involved?


What are the next steps?


==== Use Case 4: KIT ====


What is the current status?

Where shall we go?

==== Use Case 5: Hereon ====


What is the current status?

Where shall we go?


==== Use Case 6: AWI ====


What is the current status?

Where shall we go?

==== Use Case 7: FZJ ====


What is the current status?

Where shall we go?