Implementation K1

PIDInst

Use Case 1: GEOMAR

Status

PIDInst identifiers for instruments are currently not captured at GEOMAR

There is no established process or system in place for assigning or managing PIDInst identifiers

Potential responsibility is unclear, but likely involves technical and data management staff (e.g. Claas and others)

There are currently no documented workflows or institutional guidelines for PIDInst usage

* A key challenge is the lack of initial implementation and system integration * This includes missing connections to:

Instrument registries

Internal systems (e.g. OSIS or repositories)

Outlook

Establishing a clear responsibility structure, workflows, and technical integration is a necessary first step toward implementation.

Use Case 2: Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam (GFZ)

What is the current status?

Where shall we go?

Use Case 3: Helmholtzzentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)

Implementation Group ORCID:

HMC: Andrea, Manu

UFZ: Johann, Ronny

What is the current status in capturing PIDs? Who is responsible for ORCID?

What tools do we need or are involved?

What are the next steps?

Use Case 4: KIT

What is the current status?

Where shall we go?

Use Case 5: Hereon

What is the current status?

Where shall we go?

Use Case 6: AWI

What is the current status?

Where shall we go?

Use Case 7: FZJ

What is the current status?

Where shall we go?