User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:t0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:t0 [2025/07/07 10:32] – [4. The recommendation and possible consequences for implementation] dkottmeierwiki:t0 [2025/07/07 10:36] (current) – [4. The recommendation and possible consequences for implementation] dkottmeier
Line 56: Line 56:
 ====4. The recommendation and possible consequences for implementation==== ====4. The recommendation and possible consequences for implementation====
  
-Data stewards, archivists, and tool developers—including those responsible for systems used at various stages of the data lifecycle, such as data acquisition, processing, documentation, and storage—should ensure that metadata is captured in a structured and standardized manner, using harmonized metadata schemas aligned with community standards. This includes platforms such as electronic lab notebooks, archiving tools, sensor registries, and other software environments that support data generation, transformation, or submission. Metadata must be consistently annotated with well-governed controlled vocabularies to guarantee semantic clarity, interoperability, and long-term reusability across diverse data infrastructures. Providing clear documentation of the vocabularies and semantic resources in use, alongside transparent, user-friendly annotation workflows, supports consistent metadata quality and facilitates semantic integration. +[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!] 
- +
-Developers of data portals, knowledge graphs, and discovery tools should incorporate these controlled vocabularies and ontologies into their software environments. This enhances machine-readability, promotes semantic consistency across systems, and enables users to efficiently search, filter, and combine data from multiple sources. +
- +
-To enable seamless semantic annotation from the start, data producers need to be supported through targeted training and awareness initiatives that emphasize the use of community-endorsed vocabularies, structured metadata practices, and annotation best practices. Transparent user guidance and easily accessible documentation of recommended semantic resources are essential to ensure metadata quality and simplify the semantic linkage of data throughout its lifecycle.+
 ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation==== ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====
  
wiki/t0.1751884378.txt.gz · Last modified: by dkottmeier