Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m4.4 [2025/05/28 10:37] – [1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation] esoeding
+++ wiki:m4.4 [2025/05/28 20:28] (current) – [Contributors] esoeding
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
    - treat IGSN metadata as the primary source of truth within their data systems, and update the internal metadata accordingly as necessary.
-Also see [1] Baldewein et al. (2023). FAIR WISH D7 -Standard Operating Procedure for automatic IGSN registration. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10401380
@@ Line 33: / Line 32: @@
 =====Related Recommendations =====
-Parent:
+Parent: [[m4.0|Recommendation to use IGSN as the standard reference in technical infrastructures to samples where appropriate]]
-Dependent:
+Dependent: none
 Other: none
@@ Line 41: / Line 40: @@
 =====Contributors=====
-Names of contributors to this recommendation
+Emanuel Soeding (lead)
+* Please keep the lead author informed about any possible changes in this wiki.
 =====Content=====
@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 For data infrastructures, enabling the recording and harvesting of IGSNs strengthens metadata quality and ensures the persistent identification of samples and their relationships. Treating IGSN metadata as the authoritative source improves consistency, facilitates interoperability across systems, and enhances discoverability of sample-based data. This contributes to a more connected and sustainable research data ecosystem.
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
+See [[m4.0#possible_alternative_solutions|a brief discussion of alternative identifiers which could be used instead of IGSNs.]]
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====