Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m4.3 [2025/05/22 22:16] – [Recommendation] esoeding
+++ wiki:m4.3 [2025/05/28 20:27] (current) – [Contributors] esoeding
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 =====Motivation for this Recommendation: =====
-[shortened from below]
+Researchers, technicians, and others who take or handle samples are best positioned to record IGSNs because they are directly involved in the sampling process and have immediate access to critical contextual information. By recording IGSNs at the time of sampling—and documenting parent IGSNs when creating subsamples—they help ensure that sample provenance is accurately captured and preserved. This reduces the risk of information loss, supports reproducibility, and enables reliable linking of samples to data, publications, and other research outputs. Their active involvement in IGSN registration strengthens the traceability and long-term value of sample-based research.
 =====Recommendation ====
-[shortened from below]
-[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]
 It is recommended that researchers, technicians, and other people who take samples:
@@ Line 30: / Line 25: @@
 =====Precondition for Implementation: =====
+- need institutional workflows to register IGSN
+- needs training for researchers with registration and the appropriat tools and workflows.
 =====Related Recommendations =====
-Parent:
+Parent: [[m4.0|Recommendation to use IGSN as the standard reference in technical infrastructures to samples where appropriate]]
-Dependent:
+Dependent: none
 Other: none
@@ Line 40: / Line 37: @@
 =====Contributors=====
-Names of contributors to this recommendation
+Emanuel Soeding (lead)
+* Please keep the lead author informed about any possible changes in this wiki.
 =====Content=====
@@ Line 58: / Line 56: @@
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
-(quality of content, limitations, interoperability, sustainability:
+See [[m4.0#consideration_of_the_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_implementing_the_recommendation|the general discussion of advantages and challenges implementing IGSNs in the recommended way.]]
-expected future dissemination / technical availability / funding)
 ====4. The Recommendation====
-[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]
+It is recommended that researchers, technicians, and other people who take samples:
+  - record an IGSN when taking a sample.
+  - record parent IGSNs when subsampling or splitting physical samples.
 ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====
+There exist tools, which support users in registering IGSNs e.g. in the field or laboratory. RSpace [1] e.g has an integration of a field book tool Fieldmark, with it's electronic lab notebook, which can register IGSNs.
 ====6. Documentation of the test to validate correct implementation====
@@ Line 76: / Line 78: @@
 ===References===
+[1] IGSN Registration with RSpace and FieldMark [[https://documentation.researchspace.com/article/idbaaggghu-fieldmark-integration|website]]
 ===Relevant Community Recommendations===