Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m4.1 [2025/05/24 08:47] – [1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation] esoeding
+++ wiki:m4.1 [2025/05/28 15:22] (current) – [Contributors] esoeding
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 =====Precondition for Implementation: =====
+Personnel trained on the use and registration of IGSNs must exist in the organization.
 =====Related Recommendations =====
-Parent: 4.0
+Parent: [[m4.0|Recommendation to use IGSN as the standard reference in technical infrastructures to samples where appropriate]]
 Dependent: none
 Other: none
 =====Contributors=====
-Manu
+Emanuel Soeding (lead)
+* Please keep the lead author informed about any possible changes in this wiki.
 =====Content=====
@@ Line 53: / Line 57: @@
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
+Some organizations may recommend other solutions, e.g. those discussed in [[m4.0#possible_alternative_solutions|the recommendation to use IGSN alternative solutions chapter.]]
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
-(quality of content, limitations, interoperability, sustainability:
+See [[m4.0#consideration_of_the_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_implementing_the_recommendation|the general discussion of advantages and challenges implementing IGSNs in the recommended way.]]
-expected future dissemination / technical availability / funding)
 ====4. The Recommendation====
-[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]
+It is recommended, that organizations should:
+. provide a way to allow personnel to register IGSNs by either signing up with DataCite or partner with an organization or service, which allows registration of IGSNs.
+. assign a person or unit within their organization, who is responsible to maintain and curate the centres IGSNs. These could e.g. be members of a local data management team or sample curators.
 ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====