User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:m4.1

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:m4.1 [2025/05/22 11:05] – [Recommendation] esoedingwiki:m4.1 [2025/05/28 15:22] (current) – [Contributors] esoeding
Line 27: Line 27:
 =====Precondition for Implementation: ===== =====Precondition for Implementation: =====
  
 +Personnel trained on the use and registration of IGSNs must exist in the organization. 
 =====Related Recommendations ===== =====Related Recommendations =====
  
-Parent:+Parent: [[m4.0|Recommendation to use IGSN as the standard reference in technical infrastructures to samples where appropriate]]
  
-Dependent:+Dependent: none
  
 Other: none Other: none
 +
  
 =====Contributors===== =====Contributors=====
  
-Names of contributors to this recommendation+Emanuel Soeding (lead)
  
 +* Please keep the lead author informed about any possible changes in this wiki. 
 =====Content===== =====Content=====
  
Line 51: Line 54:
 __Motivation__ __Motivation__
  
 +Registering IGSNs benefits organizations by ensuring that physical samples are uniquely identifiable, traceable, and citable, which improves data quality, provenance, and reproducibility. It supports FAIR data practices by linking samples to related datasets, publications, and instruments, enhancing visibility and reuse. Organizations also gain better oversight of sample use and impact, which supports collaboration, reporting, and compliance—ultimately strengthening their role as trusted stewards of research data.
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions==== ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
  
 +Some organizations may recommend other solutions, e.g. those discussed in [[m4.0#possible_alternative_solutions|the recommendation to use IGSN alternative solutions chapter.]]
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation==== ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
  
-(quality of content, limitations, interoperability, sustainability: +See [[m4.0#consideration_of_the_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_implementing_the_recommendation|the general discussion of advantages and challenges implementing IGSNs in the recommended way.]]
-expected future dissemination / technical availability / funding) +
 ====4. The Recommendation==== ====4. The Recommendation====
  
-[FormatWer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]+It is recommended, that organizations should: 
 + 
 +1. provide a way to allow personnel to register IGSNs by either signing up with DataCite or partner with an organization or service, which allows registration of IGSNs.  
 + 
 +2. assign a person or unit within their organization, who is responsible to maintain and curate the centres IGSNs. These could e.g. be members of a local data management team or sample curators.
  
 ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation==== ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====
wiki/m4.1.1747911940.txt.gz · Last modified: by esoeding