Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m2.2 [2025/05/26 09:28] – [Motivation for this Recommendation:] esoeding
+++ wiki:m2.2 [2025/05/26 09:28] (current) – [1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation] esoeding
@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 __Motivation__
+Implementing ROR in metadata workflows helps data stewards, repository maintainers, and developers ensure cleaner, more consistent, and machine-actionable organizational references. It eliminates ambiguity caused by name variants, manual entry errors, and institutional restructuring, reducing the curation burden and improving data quality at scale. For maintainers and developers, integrating ROR enables easier linking and interoperability with external systems (e.g., ORCID, DataCite, Crossref), supports automated harvesting and reporting, and simplifies downstream integration with analytics and discovery services. Using ROR as the authoritative source ensures that organizational metadata stays up to date without requiring manual oversight. Moreover, contributing to the accuracy of ROR records fosters a more reliable global research infrastructure ecosystem—benefiting the entire community and reducing duplicated efforts across systems.
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions====