User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:m2.1

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:m2.1 [2023/12/21 08:48] – [Contributors] apoerschwiki:m2.1 [2025/05/26 09:26] (current) – [1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation] esoeding
Line 17: Line 17:
 1. name a person or unit who is responsible to maintain the centres ROR ID. This could e.g. be someone in the library, or the RDM team, or the outreach department. 1. name a person or unit who is responsible to maintain the centres ROR ID. This could e.g. be someone in the library, or the RDM team, or the outreach department.
  
-2. check the centre's ror entry at https://ror.org/.+2. check the centre's ror entry at https://ror.org/, update the entry or entries for their organization in the ROR directory or create a new one if it is not yet registered.
  
-3. update the entry or entries for their organization in the ROR directory or create a new one if it is not yet registered. +3. publish the ROR they wish to be identified as at an appropriate place(s), in the imprint of their website and in appropriate other official appearances.
- +
-4. publish the ROR they wish to be identified as at an appropriate place(s), e.g. on the imprint of their webpage or other official appearances.+
  
 =====Binding Convention: ===== =====Binding Convention: =====
Line 52: Line 50:
 __Motivation__ __Motivation__
  
 +Using ROR identifiers in data infrastructures ensures that references to research organizations are unambiguous, persistent, and globally interoperable. By recording RORs alongside organizational metadata for datasets, publications, instruments, and related entities, infrastructures enhance metadata quality, enable reliable cross-linking across systems, and support automated discovery and aggregation. Treating ROR metadata as the authoritative source helps maintain consistency and reduces manual errors or duplication in institutional references. Additionally, engaging with the ROR ecosystem—by notifying it of suspected inaccuracies—contributes to improving the global research information landscape. Adopting ROR strengthens the visibility and traceability of research outputs, aligns infrastructures with FAIR and open science principles, and facilitates seamless integration with external services such as ORCID, DataCite, and Crossref.
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions==== ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
  
Line 65: Line 64:
 1. name a person or unit who is responsible to maintain the centres ROR ID. This could e.g. be someone in the library, or the RDM team, or the outreach department. 1. name a person or unit who is responsible to maintain the centres ROR ID. This could e.g. be someone in the library, or the RDM team, or the outreach department.
  
-2. check the centre's ror entry at https://ror.org/+2. check the centre's ror entry at https://ror.org/update the entry or entries for their organization in the ROR directory or create a new one if it is not yet registered.
- +
-3. update the entry or entries for their organization in the ROR directory or create a new one if it is not yet registered.+
  
-4. publish the ROR they wish to be identified as at an appropriate place(s), e.g. on the imprint of their webpage or other official appearances.+3. publish the ROR they wish to be identified as at an appropriate place(s), e.g. on the imprint of their webpage or other official appearances.
  
 ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation==== ====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====
wiki/m2.1.1703148512.txt.gz · Last modified: by apoersch