wiki:m2.0
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:m2.0 [2023/12/20 16:25] – [4. The Recommendation] esoeding | wiki:m2.0 [2025/05/26 09:19] (current) – [2. Possible alternative solutions] esoeding | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
The database can be accessed via the official website, an open API or as a downloadable database dump. All ROR identifiers and metadata are provided under the CC0 licence. | The database can be accessed via the official website, an open API or as a downloadable database dump. All ROR identifiers and metadata are provided under the CC0 licence. | ||
====2. Possible alternative solutions==== | ====2. Possible alternative solutions==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Several alternatives exist: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. GRID (Global Research Identifier Database) [Deprecated, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Status: No longer maintained, but still used in legacy systems. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Scope: Global research institutions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Use case: May be used if your system still relies on GRID identifiers, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: Since ROR is a community-led continuation of GRID, migrating to ROR is generally encouraged. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 2. ISNI (International Standard Name Identifier) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Scope: Broad—covers not only research institutions but also other organizations and individuals involved in creative or intellectual work. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Managed by: ISNI International Agency. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Use case: Useful for linking to authority records in library or publishing systems (e.g., for institutions in MARC21 authority data). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 3. National or Domain-Specific Authority Files | ||
+ | |||
+ | Examples include: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * GND (Gemeinsame Normdatei) – German National Authority File. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * LCNAF – Library of Congress Name Authority File (U.S.). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * SUDOC – French academic institutions (Abes). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Use case: Often used in library, archival, or bibliometric infrastructures. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Limitation: Coverage and update frequency vary; may not be globally interoperable. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Internal Institutional IDs | ||
+ | |||
+ | Scope: Local or consortium-level identifiers for partner institutions or affiliates. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Use case: When working within a closed or federated system (e.g., within Helmholtz or NFDI), organizations may assign internal codes or URIs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Caution: Not globally resolvable unless made publicly accessible. | ||
====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation==== | ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation==== |
wiki/m2.0.1703089537.txt.gz · Last modified: by esoeding