HMC Community Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
wiki:m2.0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
wiki:m2.0 [2023/11/06 17:50] – [1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation] apoerschwiki:m2.0 [2023/12/20 16:25] (current) – [4. The Recommendation] esoeding
Line 5: Line 5:
 =====Description===== =====Description=====
  
-[Status: Under development, Date: 2023-10-30, Version: 001] +[Status: Under development, Date: ~~LASTMOD~~, Version: 001] 
  
 =====Motivation for this Recommendation: ===== =====Motivation for this Recommendation: =====
  
  
-The Helmholtz Association is determined to make their data available according to the FAIR principles, thus making it findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. In order to achieve interoperability of datasets among various data infrastructures (DIS) within the Helmholtz Association, a common and agreed procedure to refer to people within and across the DIS is needed.+The Helmholtz Association is determined to make their data available according to the FAIR principles, thus making it findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. In order to achieve interoperability of datasets among various data infrastructures (DIS) within the Helmholtz Association, a common and agreed procedure to refer to the respective Helmholtz Centres (organisations) within and across the DIS is needed.
  
 In order to be able to uniquely and sustainably identify the responsibilities and the context of cooperation within data infrastructures and repositories in the Helmholtz Association, the referencing of the respective centre should in principle be carried out with a persistent identifier (PID). In order to be able to uniquely and sustainably identify the responsibilities and the context of cooperation within data infrastructures and repositories in the Helmholtz Association, the referencing of the respective centre should in principle be carried out with a persistent identifier (PID).
Line 22: Line 22:
  
  
-Binding Convention: +=====Binding Convention===== 
-^                         ^ mandatory  ^ conditional           ^ optional ^+|                         ^ mandatory  ^ conditional           ^ optional ^
 ^ Helmholtz FAIR Principle|            | mandatory if ROR is available|          | ^ Helmholtz FAIR Principle|            | mandatory if ROR is available|          |
  
Line 59: Line 59:
  
 __Current Use of ...__ __Current Use of ...__
 +
 +Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ROR. Among them e.g. Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [1]
  
 __Motivation__ __Motivation__
Line 75: Line 77:
  
 ====4. The Recommendation==== ====4. The Recommendation====
 +It is recommended that all data infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ROR to identify organizations to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible. 
  
-[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!] +==== 5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====
- +
-====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the +
-recommendation====+
  
 ====6. Documentation of the test to validate correct implementation==== ====6. Documentation of the test to validate correct implementation====
Line 90: Line 90:
  
 ===References=== ===References===
 +
 +[1] Entwicklung in Baden-Württemberg: ORCID und ROR IDs als Standard für langfristige Personen- und Institutionen-Identifier[[https://bausteine-fdm.de/article/view/8272]]
  
 ===Relevant Community Recommendations=== ===Relevant Community Recommendations===
wiki/m2.0.1699293011.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/11/06 17:50 by apoersch