Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m1.2 [2023/12/20 14:57] – [2. Possible alternative solutions] lbaldewein
+++ wiki:m1.2 [2023/12/20 15:18] (current) – [2. Possible alternative solutions] esoeding
@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
-Besides ORCID other PID systems for authors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID / PublonsID, ISNI and Wikidata ID. We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detail. We found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned above. In order to harmonize our metadata we therefore recommend it as a common solution to refer to authors / contributers in Helmholtz data infrastructures.
+see [[https://earth-and-environment.helmholtz-metadaten.de/wiki/doku.php?id=wiki:m1.0#possible_alternative_solutions|recommendation M1.0]]
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 ====4. The Recommendation====
-It is recommended, that Helmholtz employees should
+It is recommended, that Helmholtz employees
 .	register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already and keep their ORCID related metadata current and
-.	share the relevant parts of this data with the center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
+.	share the relevant parts of this data with their center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
 Note 1: regarding activity 2, we recommend that employees publish their ORCID as part of their public data, a) in their email footer, b) on their personal institutional homepage.