User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:m1.2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:m1.2 [2023/12/19 15:48] – [Description] esoedingwiki:m1.2 [2023/12/20 15:18] (current) – [2. Possible alternative solutions] esoeding
Line 5: Line 5:
 =====Description===== =====Description=====
  
-[Status: Under development, Date: 2023-12-18, Version: 001]+[Status: Under development, Date: ~~LASTMOD~~, Version: 001]
  
 =====Motivation for this Recommendation: ===== =====Motivation for this Recommendation: =====
Line 21: Line 21:
 It is recommended, that anyone contributing to data products should It is recommended, that anyone contributing to data products should
  
-  - register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already +  - register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already, 
-  - keep their ORCID related metadata current and  +  - keep their ORCID related metadata current and 
-  - share the relevant parts of this data with the center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.+  - share the relevant parts of this data with their center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
  
  
Line 62: Line 62:
  
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions==== ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
-Besides ORCID other PID systems for autors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID PublonsID, ISNI, Wikidata ID. We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detailWe found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned aboveIn order to harmonize our metadata we therefore recommend it as a common solution to refer to authors contributers in Helmholtz data infrastructures+see [[https://earth-and-environment.helmholtz-metadaten.de/wiki/doku.php?id=wiki:m1.0#possible_alternative_solutions|recommendation M1.0]]
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation==== ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
  
Line 74: Line 74:
 ====4. The Recommendation==== ====4. The Recommendation====
  
-It is recommended, that Helmholtz employees should +It is recommended, that Helmholtz employees
  
 1. register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already and keep their ORCID related metadata current and  1. register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already and keep their ORCID related metadata current and 
  
-2. share the relevant parts of this data with the center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.+2. share the relevant parts of this data with their center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
  
 Note 1: regarding activity 2, we recommend that employees publish their ORCID as part of their public data, a) in their email footer, b) on their personal institutional homepage.  Note 1: regarding activity 2, we recommend that employees publish their ORCID as part of their public data, a) in their email footer, b) on their personal institutional homepage. 
wiki/m1.2.1703000902.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/12/19 15:48 by esoeding