Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m1.2 [2023/09/19 22:36] – [Recommendation] esoeding
+++ wiki:m1.2 [2023/12/20 15:18] (current) – [2. Possible alternative solutions] esoeding
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 =====Description=====
-[Status: Under development, Date: 2023-08-25, Version: 001]
+[Status: Under development, Date: ~~LASTMOD~~, Version: 001]
 =====Motivation for this Recommendation: =====
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 It is recommended, that anyone contributing to data products should
-  - register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already
+  - register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already,
   - keep their ORCID related metadata current and
-  - share the relevant parts of this data with the center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
+  - share the relevant parts of this data with their center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 For the Helmholtz Association we recommend to use ORCID to refer to people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association wherever possible (see recommendation M1.0).
-To be able to implement this measure, several activities need to be conducted by different stakeholder groups. This recommendation M1.2. calls for activity of the contributing to data products.
+To be able to implement this measure, several activities need to be conducted by different stakeholder groups. This recommendation M1.2. calls for activity of **anyone contributing to data products**.
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
+see [[https://earth-and-environment.helmholtz-metadaten.de/wiki/doku.php?id=wiki:m1.0#possible_alternative_solutions|recommendation M1.0]]
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
-(quality of content, limitations, interoperability, sustainability:
+The use of ORCID allows to automate the aquisition of metadata with publications and data sets. Authors may therefore save significant time and work by avoiding to submit metadata about themselves and their employers. i.e. when submitting an ORICD as an author or contributor reference the respective public metadata can be retrieved from ORCID and doesn't have to be provided separately. Proper attribution of publications and datasets could improve the employees internal publication record.
-expected future dissemination / technical availability / funding)
+It is recommended, to acknowledge data publications in a similar manner as scientific publications in journals, which means, that they count towards all employees annual achievements and count against performance based funding schemes.
+ORCIDs allow data systems to trace peoples activities and create a professional profile of individuals. Although these profiles do not necessarily need to be linked to names or other private information, this could be of concern to some people. Data privacy managers should therefore be informed about the way ORICD is encouraged by the center management. Data privacy officers should approve the procedures implemented to manage ORCID in the centers.
 ====4. The Recommendation====
-It is recommended, that Helmholtz employees should
+It is recommended, that Helmholtz employees
 .	register with ORCID if they haven’t done so already and keep their ORCID related metadata current and
-.	share the relevant parts of this data with the center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
+.	share the relevant parts of this data with their center for use in the centers data systems in order to keep the information in the systems current.
 Note 1: regarding activity 2, we recommend that employees publish their ORCID as part of their public data, a) in their email footer, b) on their personal institutional homepage.