Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m1.1 [2023/12/20 14:50] – [3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation] lbaldewein
+++ wiki:m1.1 [2023/12/20 16:50] (current) – [Recommendation] esoeding
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ====Recommendation ===
 It is recommended, that center management should
 .	Employ measures and incentives to actively encourage all employees to register with ORCID and to keep their metadata current and share the relevant parts of this data with the center.
 .	Keep record of their staffs ORCIDs and share them with the RDM teams, where appropriate, in order to record ORCIDs with their output.
+.      Become an ORCID member to integrate ORCID metadata within the centers' publication system and ensure the long-term sustainability of the ORCID identifier.
 =====Binding Convention: =====
@@ Line 67: / Line 70: @@
 ====2. Possible alternative solutions====
+see [[https://earth-and-environment.helmholtz-metadaten.de/wiki/doku.php?id=wiki:m1.0#possible_alternative_solutions|recommendation M1.0]]
-Besides ORCID other PID systems for authors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID / PublonsID, ISNI and Wikidata ID.
-We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detail. We found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned above.
 ====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
 a. Suggested procedures to be implemented
@@ Line 92: / Line 91: @@
 .	Keep record of their staffs ORCIDs and share them with the RDM teams, where appropriate, in order to record ORCIDs with their output.
+.      Become an ORCID member to integrate ORCID metadata within the centers' publication system and ensure the long-term sustainability of the ORCID identifier.
 Note 1: regarding activity 1, there exist multiple possible ways to encourage employees to register and maintain their ORCIDs. These could e.g. be sharing information about the benefits of traceable information for the center and science as a whole, benefits for their department, by being able to track the departments scientific output, benefits to themselves, for not repeatedly being asked for permissions to use their data. It is also possible, that prices or rewards are issued to persons sharing their data. Due to the many way this can be envisioned, particular implementation scenarios will be collected below.
-Note 2: regarding activity 2 we recommend, to make the collection of the ORCID, the granting of permission and the agreement to use and update the ORCID data a structural part of the employment process conducted by the personnel department. Forms may be developed registering the necessary data and signing off on the use, informational leavlets may inform the person about the circumstances, how and where the data is used, and how they can revoke permissions to use it. These procedures should comply with the legal requirements in data protection e.g. the GDPR (DSGVO). The processes implemented will be briefly documented below.
+Note 2: regarding activity 2, we recommend to make the collection of the ORCID, the granting of permission and the agreement to use and update the ORCID data a structural part of the employment process conducted by the personnel department. Forms may be developed registering the necessary data and signing off on the use, informational leaflets may inform the person about the circumstances, how and where the data is used, and how they can revoke permissions to use it. These procedures should comply with the legal requirements in data protection e.g. the GDPR (DSGVO). The processes implemented will be briefly documented below.