User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:m1.0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:m1.0 [2025/06/18 11:07] – [History and structure] dkottmeierwiki:m1.0 [2025/06/18 11:33] (current) – [8. Further Information] dkottmeier
Line 51: Line 51:
 ==== Current Use of ORCID ==== ==== Current Use of ORCID ====
  
-ORCID is currently the most widely used system for referencing scientific persons / authors (Researcher / Contributor). Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ORCID. Among them the Alfred-Wegener-Institut [1], the Fachinformationsdienst Geowissenschaften der Niedersächsischen Bibliotheken [2], the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam [3], the Technical University Munich [4], DINI [7, 8, 9] FAIRsFAIR [10, 11], Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [13] and others. Nowadays ORICDs are widely used as a de-facto standard to refer to authors of scientific publications by publishers and repository maintainers alike. +ORCID is currently the most widely used system for referencing scientific persons / authors (Researcher / Contributor). Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ORCID. Among them the Alfred-Wegener-Institut [1], the Fachinformationsdienst Geowissenschaften der Niedersächsischen Bibliotheken [2], the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam [3], the Technical University Munich [4], DINI [7, 8, 9]FAIRsFAIR [10, 11], Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [13] and others. Nowadays ORICDs are widely used as a de-facto standard to refer to authors of scientific publications by publishers and repository maintainers alike. 
 ==== Motivation ==== ==== Motivation ====
  
Line 70: Line 70:
 ... [open / still to be done] welche ... [open / still to be done] welche
  
-d. The use of ORCID may lead to certain data privacy issues. E.g. people’s role and impact within the research community can be tracked by combining personal and bibliographical data. Data privacy concerns should be discussed with the data privacy officers at the respective Helmholtz centers. It is therefore imperativethat the use of ORCIDs is not forcedbut a deliberate – though encouraged – decision by each individual. It is important to note, that technically it is not necessary to publish any metadata with ORCIDs. It may still be possible to publish any ORCID anonymously, still referring to the same person. Details need to be defined through a dialogue with the data privacy officers. +d. The use of ORCID may lead to certain data privacy issues. E.g. people’s role and impact within the research community can be tracked by combining personal and bibliographical data. Data privacy concerns should be discussed with the data privacy officers at the respective Helmholtz centers. It is therefore imperative that the use of ORCIDs is not forced but a deliberate – though encouraged – decision by each individual. It is important to note, that technically it is not necessary to publish any metadata with ORCIDs. It may still be possible to publish any ORCID anonymously, still referring to the same person. Details need to be defined through a dialogue with the data privacy officers. 
  
 ==== 4. The Recommendation ==== ==== 4. The Recommendation ====
Line 108: Line 108:
 === References === === References ===
  
-[1] Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und MeeresforschungORCID https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/ORCID+[1] PANGAEA Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/ORCID
  
 [2] FID GEO recommends the use of ORCID ID, originally published in GMIT 87:  https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5832 [2] FID GEO recommends the use of ORCID ID, originally published in GMIT 87:  https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5832
wiki/m1.0.1750244869.txt.gz · Last modified: by dkottmeier