HMC Community Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
wiki:m1.0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
wiki:m1.0 [2023/12/20 14:34] – [History and structure] lbaldeweinwiki:m1.0 [2024/08/21 09:46] (current) – [8. Further Information] apoersch
Line 17: Line 17:
 It is recommended that all data infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ORCID to identify people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible. It is recommended that all data infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ORCID to identify people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible.
  
-Binding Convention:+===== Binding Convention =====
 |                        ^ mandatory  ^ conditional           ^ optional ^ |                        ^ mandatory  ^ conditional           ^ optional ^
 ^ Helmholtz FAIR Principle|            | mandatory if ORCID is available|          | ^ Helmholtz FAIR Principle|            | mandatory if ORCID is available|          |
Line 50: Line 50:
 ==== Current Use of ORCID ==== ==== Current Use of ORCID ====
  
-ORCID is currently the most widely used system for referencing scientific persons / authors (Researcher / Contributor). Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ORCID. Among them the Alfred Wegener Instituit [1], the Fachinformationsdienst Geowissenschaften der Niedersächsischen Bibliotheken [2], the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam [3], the Technical University Munich [4], DINI [7, 8, 9] FAIRsFAIR [10, 11], Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [13] and others. Nowadays ORICDs are widely used as a de-facto standard to refer to authors of scientific publications by publishers and repository maintainers alike. +ORCID is currently the most widely used system for referencing scientific persons / authors (Researcher / Contributor). Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ORCID. Among them the Alfred-Wegener-Institut [1], the Fachinformationsdienst Geowissenschaften der Niedersächsischen Bibliotheken [2], the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam [3], the Technical University Munich [4], DINI [7, 8, 9] FAIRsFAIR [10, 11], Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [13] and others. Nowadays ORICDs are widely used as a de-facto standard to refer to authors of scientific publications by publishers and repository maintainers alike. 
 ==== Motivation ==== ==== Motivation ====
  
Line 57: Line 57:
 ==== 2. Possible alternative solutions ==== ==== 2. Possible alternative solutions ====
  
-Besides ORCID other PID systems for autors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID / PublonsID, ISNI, Wikidata ID.  +Besides ORCID other PID systems for authors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID / PublonsID, ISNI and Wikidata ID. We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detail. We found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned above. In order to harmonize our metadata we therefore recommend it as a common solution to refer to authors / contributers in Helmholtz data infrastructures. 
-We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detail. We found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned above. +
 ==== 3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation ==== ==== 3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation ====
  
Line 74: Line 73:
 ==== 4. The Recommendation ==== ==== 4. The Recommendation ====
  
-[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!] 
 It is recommended that all Data Infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ORCID to identify people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible. It is recommended that all Data Infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ORCID to identify people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible.
 Details can be found in related recommendations (see above). Details can be found in related recommendations (see above).
Line 111: Line 109:
 [1] Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung: ORCID https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/ORCID [1] Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung: ORCID https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/ORCID
  
-[2] FID GEO recommends the use of ORCID ID see page 30 in GMIT: https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5386+[2] FID GEO recommends the use of ORCID ID, originally published in GMIT 87:  https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5832
  
 [3] GFZ recommends the use of ORCID ID see webpage: https://bib.telegrafenberg.de/publizieren/orcid-id [3] GFZ recommends the use of ORCID ID see webpage: https://bib.telegrafenberg.de/publizieren/orcid-id
Line 135: Line 133:
 [12] ORCID Terms of use: https://info.orcid.org/terms-of-use/ [12] ORCID Terms of use: https://info.orcid.org/terms-of-use/
  
-[13] Entwicklung in Baden-Württemberg: ORCID und ROR IDs als Standard für langfristige Personen- und Institutionen-Identifierhttps://bausteine-fdm.de/article/view/8272+[13] Entwicklung in Baden-Württemberg: ORCID und ROR IDs als Standard für langfristige Personen- und Institutionen-Identifier https://bausteine-fdm.de/article/view/8272 
 ==== 9. History of this document ==== ==== 9. History of this document ====
  
  
  
wiki/m1.0.1703082892.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/12/20 14:34 by lbaldewein