Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:m1.0 [2023/12/20 14:32] – [1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation] lbaldewein
+++ wiki:m1.0 [2024/08/21 09:46] (current) – [8. Further Information] apoersch
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 It is recommended that all data infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ORCID to identify people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible.
-Binding Convention:
+===== Binding Convention =====
 |                        ^ mandatory  ^ conditional	          ^ optional ^
 ^ Helmholtz FAIR Principle|            | mandatory if ORCID is available|          |
@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 ==== History and structure ====
-ORICID issues ORCIDs since 2012 to identify autors in scientific publications (see https://info.orcid.org/orcid-launches-registry/). ORCIDS are globally unique. It maintains a stable governance overseeing the developments of the concepts and the underlying infrastructure. It is funded by the ORCID members, consisting of research institutions, publishers, governmental and industrial organizations. The ORCID infrastructure has proven to be very reliable. Besides web interfaces it features an API, which can be accessed for data retrieval by machines. ORICD maintains a publicly available metadata schema, which is accessible through open interfaces. ORCIDs are free of charge to be used by anyone interested.
+ORICID issues ORCIDs since 2012 to identify autors in scientific publications (see https://info.orcid.org/orcid-launches-registry/). ORCIDS are globally unique. ORCID maintains a stable governance overseeing the developments of the concepts and the underlying infrastructure. It is funded by the ORCID members, consisting of research institutions, publishers, governmental and industrial organizations. The ORCID infrastructure has proven to be very reliable. Besides web interfaces it features an API, which can be accessed for data retrieval by machines. ORICD maintains a publicly available metadata schema, which is accessible through open interfaces. ORCIDs are free of charge to be used by anyone interested.
 ==== Current Use of ORCID ====
-ORCID is currently the most widely used system for referencing scientific persons / authors (Researcher / Contributor). Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ORCID. Among them the Alfred Wegener Instituit [1], the Fachinformationsdienst Geowissenschaften der Niedersächsischen Bibliotheken [2], the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam [3], the Technical University Munich [4], DINI [7, 8, 9] FAIRsFAIR [10, 11], Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [13] and others. Nowadays ORICDs are widely used as a de-facto standard to refer to authors of scientific publications by publishers and repository maintainers alike.
+ORCID is currently the most widely used system for referencing scientific persons / authors (Researcher / Contributor). Over the recent years numerous repositories and initiatives have recommended the use of ORCID. Among them the Alfred-Wegener-Institut [1], the Fachinformationsdienst Geowissenschaften der Niedersächsischen Bibliotheken [2], the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam [3], the Technical University Munich [4], DINI [7, 8, 9] FAIRsFAIR [10, 11], Arbeitskreis Forschungsdatenmanagement (AK FDM) in Baden-Württemberg [13] and others. Nowadays ORICDs are widely used as a de-facto standard to refer to authors of scientific publications by publishers and repository maintainers alike.
 ==== Motivation ====
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 ==== 2. Possible alternative solutions ====
-Besides ORCID other PID systems for autors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID / PublonsID, ISNI, Wikidata ID.
+Besides ORCID other PID systems for authors of scientific publications exist. The most relevant are Scopus Author ID, Researcher ID / PublonsID, ISNI and Wikidata ID. We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detail. We found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned above. In order to harmonize our metadata we therefore recommend it as a common solution to refer to authors / contributers in Helmholtz data infrastructures.
-We will not discuss the pro’s and con’s of each PID system here in detail. We found, however, that ORCID offers the best solution in terms of stability, reliability, cost efficiency and widespread application of the PID systems mentioned above.
 ==== 3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation ====
@@ Line 74: / Line 73: @@
 ==== 4. The Recommendation ====
-[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]
 It is recommended that all Data Infrastructures and repositories of the Helmholtz Association use ORCID to identify people and contributors to resources in data infrastructures wherever and whenever possible.
 Details can be found in related recommendations (see above).
@@ Line 111: / Line 109: @@
 [1] Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung: ORCID https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/ORCID
-[2] FID GEO recommends the use of ORCID ID see page 30 in GMIT: https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5386
+[2] FID GEO recommends the use of ORCID ID, originally published in GMIT 87:  https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5832
 [3] GFZ recommends the use of ORCID ID see webpage: https://bib.telegrafenberg.de/publizieren/orcid-id
@@ Line 135: / Line 133: @@
 [12] ORCID Terms of use: https://info.orcid.org/terms-of-use/
-[13] Entwicklung in Baden-Württemberg: ORCID und ROR IDs als Standard für langfristige Personen- und Institutionen-Identifierhttps://bausteine-fdm.de/article/view/8272
+[13] Entwicklung in Baden-Württemberg: ORCID und ROR IDs als Standard für langfristige Personen- und Institutionen-Identifier https://bausteine-fdm.de/article/view/8272
 ==== 9. History of this document ====