User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:5_management:1_deprecated:m0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
wiki:5_management:1_deprecated:m0 [2026/03/30 13:53] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1wiki:5_management:1_deprecated:m0 [2026/03/30 13:53] (current) – ↷ Page moved from wiki:4_management:1_deprecated:m0 to wiki:5_management:1_deprecated:m0 jwurz
Line 1: Line 1:
 +**Recommendation M0 **
 +
 +======Recommendation to use stable PID systems to refer to frequently used redundant metadata wherever possible======
 +
 +=====Description=====
 +
 +Status: ~~LASTMOD~~ Under development
 +
 +
 +[1] European Commission: A Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)
 +=====Motivation for this Recommendation: =====
 +
 +[shortened from below]
 +
 +=====Recommendation ====
 +
 +[shortened from below]
 +
 +[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]
 +
 +=====Binding Convention: =====
 +
 +
 +^                         ^ mandatory  ^ conditional           ^ optional ^
 +^ Helmholtz FAIR Principle|            |      |          |
 +
 +=====Precondition for Implementation: =====
 +
 +=====Related Recommendations =====
 +
 +Parent:
 +
 +Dependent:
 +
 +Other: none
 +
 +=====Contributors=====
 +
 +Names of contributors to this recommendation
 +
 +=====Content=====
 +
 +====1. Explanation of the Background and Benefits of the Recommendation ====
 +
 +__About__
 +
 +Defintion of PIDs
 +  * A persistent identifier (PI or PID) is a long-lasting reference to a document, file, web page, or other object (from Wikipedia).
 +  * PID registers typically store core metadata with the PID
 +  * PIDs are used in data infrastructures to link to common information 
 +  * Harmonizing the use of PIDs may improve interoperability of datasets between data repositories
 +
 +Criteria for the evaluation of PID Systems
 +
 +  - PID is globally unambiguously registerable
 +  - PIDs are widely used, e.g. recommended by national and international organizations
 +  - PID registrar has a transparent governance
 +  - Handle system has stable funding
 +  - PID system is reliably available and maintained
 +  - PIDs have an adequate metadata set
 +  - PID registration is open to all (vs. paying users only)
 +  - PID is machine readable via API
 +  - Further developments are downward compatible (with previous updates, content and technical)
 +  - Also: What other PID systems capture the same types of data?
 +
 +
 +
 +__History and structure__
 +
 +__Current Use of ...__
 +
 +__Motivation__
 +
 +====2. Possible alternative solutions====
 +
 +====3. Consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the recommendation====
 +
 +(quality of content, limitations, interoperability, sustainability:
 +expected future dissemination / technical availability / funding)
 +
 +====4. The Recommendation====
 +
 +[Format: Wer! macht was! wo! wann! unter welchen Voraussetzungen!]
 +
 +====5. Naming of communities that have already implemented the recommendation====
 +
 +====6. Documentation of the test to validate correct implementation====
 +
 +
 +
 +====7. Examples of Instances====
 +
 +====8. Further Information====
 +
 +===References===
 +
 +[1] European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, EOSC Executive Board, Hellström, M., Heughebaert, A., Kotarski, R. et al., A Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), Publications Office, 2020, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/926037
 +
 +===Relevant Community Recommendations===
 +
 +====9. History of this document====