User Tools

Site Tools


start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
start [2026/08/04 12:53] esoedingstart [2026/08/04 13:36] (current) – [The Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration] esoeding
Line 5: Line 5:
 */ */
  
-====== Preface ====== 
  
-The publication of *The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship* [[start|[1]]] addressed a persistent challenge within the research data management community. Although the importance of responsible research data management was widely recognized among data professionals, its objectives and benefits often remained difficult to communicate to researchers, decision-makers, and other stakeholders outside dedicated RDM teams. In particular, data managers frequently encountered uncertainty regarding the value of data documentation, the manner in which such documentation should be structured, and the benefits that systematic data stewardship could provide.+====== Introduction ======
  
-The FAIR Guiding Principles offered a concise and broadly applicable framework through which these objectives could be articulated. By defining four high-level properties—Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability—the principles provided a common vocabulary for describing the intended outcomes of research data management. These overarching objectives were complemented by a set of more specific sub-principles—F1–F4, A1–A2, I1–I3, and R1–R1.3—which describe characteristics and practices intended to support their realization.+/*  
 +===== The Character of This Wiki =====
  
-The FAIR framework was readily adopted by the RDM community and increasingly informed the development of data infrastructures, services, and research data ecosystemsIn many cases, these systems were designed or adapted to satisfy the more detailed FAIR sub-principlesHoweverthe principles were deliberately formulated at a high level and therefore present several limitations for their practical implementation:+Welcome to the wiki of [[https://www.helmholtz-metadaten.de/|Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration (HMC)]] Hub Earth and Environment! This platform is a permanent work in progress and represents our perspectives as the HMC Hub Earth and Environment and our communityMore formal results are derived from here and published on the [[https://helmholtz-metadaten.de/|HMC website]][[https://helmholtz-metadaten.de/earth-and-environment|our Hubs website]], or in other resources.
  
-1. **FAIR is not a technical standard.** It defines desired properties of digital research objects but does not prescribe a specific technical architecture or implementation.+===== The Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration =====
  
-2. **FAIR provides limited implementation guidance.** The principles do not determine which formats, metadata schemas, software systems, protocols, or technologies should be used.+The HMC promotes the qualitative enrichment of research data by means of metadata – and implements this approach across the whole organization.
  
-3. **FAIR depends on community standards.** Effective implementation requires research communities to agree upon relevant standards and to apply them consistently.+HMC develops and implements concepts and technologies for a sustainable handling of research data through high-quality metadata. Its main goal is to make the depth and breadth of research data produced by Helmholtz Centers findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR Principles((Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 (2016). ))) for the whole science community. The intention to ensure FAIR data across Helmholtz is also contained in the "Recommendations for Policies of the Helmholtz Centers on Research Data Management"((Empfehlungen für Richtlinien der Helmholtz-Zentren zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten, 2019, Helmholtz Open Science, https://os.helmholtz.de/open-research-data/forschungsdaten-policies/ doi: doi.org/10.2312/os.helmholtz.002)).
  
-4. **FAIRness is incremental.** Digital objects may satisfy individual principles to different degrees and may therefore exhibit varying levels of FAIRness.+Many people and stakeholder groups produce data relevant for research data, information and knowledge systemsIn order to create a harmonized interoperable and ultimately **[[wiki:0_vision-and-mission:start|FAIR data space]]**, practices and processes need to be aligned across our data systems and implemented by these people and stakeholders.
  
-5. **Machine actionability remains limited.** The complete and autonomous interpretation and processing of digital objects by machines may rarely be achievable. 
  
-6. **Rich metadata alone do not ensure interoperability.** Interoperability additionally requires shared representation languages, controlled vocabularies, semantic alignment, and explicitly defined relationships between digital objects.+===== The Content of This Wiki =====
  
-7. **FAIR does not imply unrestricted openness.** Data subject to access restrictions may nevertheless be FAIR, provided that their metadata, access conditions, and access procedures are clearly described.+/*Alternative: Metadata Management Recommendations and Best Practices*
 +/* 
 +In this Wikithe HMC Hub Earth and Environment and its partners will **formulate recommendations** for such aligned practices for the community. We are making concrete suggestions for the implementation and support with practical suggestions for such procedures.
  
-8. **FAIR is not a comprehensive governance framework.** It focuses primarily on the properties of digital research objects and does not encompass all responsibilities of data producersrepositories, research infrastructures, and institutions.+To achieve FAIR data across the various Helmholtz Earth and Environment data infrastructures (DIS), we have developed the **[[wiki:1_road-to-fair-strategy:start|Road-to-FAIR-Strategy]]**. This strategy describes a number of coordinated efforts. As a first step, the existing DIS and their interfaces are examined to identify best practices that can serve as models. Based on thisdifferent committees work together to develop concrete implementation steps for specific goals. For each agreed-upon building blockconcrete recommendations are formulated and documented. These recommendations are developed and presented in this Wiki as a living handbook and will evolve over time as work progresses.
  
-The central implementation challenge may therefore be summarized as follows: the FAIR Guiding Principles define the properties that well-managed digital research objects should exhibitbut they do not themselves provide the shared standards, technical specifications, or coordinated governance required to realize those propertiesTheir practical effectiveness consequently depends on research communities agreeing upon and consistently applying persistent identifiers, metadata schemassemantic vocabularies, access protocols, provenance models, licences, and other domain-relevant standards.+The resulting recommendations are consistently documented using the same guiding questions and a harmonized structure. Two perspectives must therefore be consideredon the one hand, the discussion and agreement on content; on the otherthe administrative and technical implementation. Each individual step required for implementation must be examinedThe perspectives and roles of the various stakeholders are taken into account to ensure that all influencing factors are considered in detail. In additionthe decision-making processes that lead to established procedures are outlined—both from the bottom up and from the top down.
  
-The present wiki seeks to address this implementation gap by supporting the coordinated application of FAIR practices across the Helmholtz Association. It provides guidance on the selection and consistent use of relevant standardstechnologies, and community practices, with the aim of enabling research data products to attain the highest practicable level of FAIRness.+This provides a foundation for optimizing the procedures concerning the individuals involvedtheir responsibilities, and the necessary actions. In order for the FAIR approach to be successful, it is essential that identified stakeholders take on specific responsibilities*/
  
-====== Introduction ====== 
  
-/* ===== The Character of This Wiki =====+=====  The Character of This Wiki ===== 
  
-Welcome to the wiki of [[https://www.helmholtz-metadaten.de/|Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration (HMC)]] Hub Earth and Environment! This platform is a permanent work in progress and represents our perspectives as the HMC Hub Earth and Environment and our community. More formal results are derived from here and published on the [[https://helmholtz-metadaten.de/|HMC website]][[https://helmholtz-metadaten.de/earth-and-environment|our Hubs website]]or in other resources.+This wiki serves as the collaborative working platform of the Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration (HMC) Hub Earth and Environment. It is conceived as living resource that reflects the current perspectives, discussions, and activities of the Hub and its wider community. Its content is continuously refined as new requirements emergeimplementation experience is gainedand community agreements evolve.
  
-===== The Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration =====+The wiki primarily supports the development, discussion, and documentation of concepts and recommendations. More formalized outcomes derived from this work are published through the central HMC website, the website of the HMC Hub Earth and Environment, or other appropriate publications and resources.
  
-The HMC promotes the qualitative enrichment of research data by means of metadata – and implements this approach across the whole organization.+=====  The Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration ===== 
  
-HMC develops and implements concepts and technologies for a sustainable handling of research data through high-quality metadata. Its main goal is to make the depth and breadth of research data produced by Helmholtz Centers findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR Principles((Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 (2016). ))) for the whole science community. The intention to ensure FAIR data across Helmholtz is also contained in the "Recommendations for Policies of the Helmholtz Centers on Research Data Management"((Empfehlungen für Richtlinien der Helmholtz-Zentren zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten, 2019, Helmholtz Open Science, https://os.helmholtz.de/open-research-data/forschungsdaten-policies/ doi: doi.org/10.2312/os.helmholtz.002)).+The Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration promotes the qualitative enrichment of research data through high-quality metadata and supports the implementation of this approach throughout the Helmholtz Association.
  
-Many people and stakeholder groups produce data relevant for research data, information and knowledge systemsIn order to create a harmonized interoperable and ultimately **[[wiki:0_vision-and-mission:start|FAIR data space]]**, practices and processes need to be aligned across our data systems and implemented by these people and stakeholders.+HMC develops and implements concepts, services, and technologies for the sustainable management of research data. Its principal objective is to ensure that the breadth and depth of research data produced by the Helmholtz Centres can be discovered, accessed, interpreted, and reused by the wider scientific community in accordance with the **FAIR Guiding Principles**.[1] The objective of enabling FAIR research data across the Helmholtz Association is also reflected in the **Recommendations for Policies of the Helmholtz Centres on Research Data Management**.[2]
  
 +Research data, metadata, information, and knowledge systems are created and maintained by a wide range of individuals, institutions, and stakeholder groups. The establishment of a harmonized, interoperable, and ultimately FAIR research data space therefore requires the alignment of practices, responsibilities, and technical processes across heterogeneous data infrastructures. Such alignment must be implemented not only within technical systems but also through the coordinated activities of the people and organizations responsible for producing, managing, curating, and providing access to research data.
  
-===== The Content of This Wiki =====+=====  The Content of This Wiki ===== 
  
-/*Alternative: Metadata Management Recommendations and Best Practices*/+Within this wiki, the HMC Hub Earth and Environment and its partners formulate recommendations for the alignment of research data management practices across the Earth and Environment community. The wiki translates general objectives into concrete implementation guidance and provides practical support for the adoption of coordinated procedures.
  
-In this Wiki, the HMC Hub Earth and Environment and its partners will **formulate recommendations** for such aligned practices for the communityWe are making concrete suggestions for the implementation and support with practical suggestions for such procedures.+To advance FAIR research data across the diverse data infrastructures of the Helmholtz Research Field Earth and Environment, the Hub has developed the **Road-to-FAIR Strategy**. This strategy comprises a series of coordinated activities through which shared requirements are identified, discussed, and translated into implementable recommendations.
  
-To achieve FAIR data across the various Helmholtz Earth and Environment data infrastructures (DIS), we have developed the **[[wiki:1_road-to-fair-strategy:start|Road-to-FAIR-Strategy]]**. This strategy describes a number of coordinated efforts. As a first step, the existing DIS and their interfaces are examined to identify best practices that can serve as models. Based on this, different committees work together to develop concrete implementation steps for specific goals. For each agreed-upon building block, concrete recommendations are formulated and documented. These recommendations are developed and presented in this Wiki as a living handbook and will evolve over time as work progresses.+As an initial step, existing data infrastructures and their interfaces are examined in order to identify established practices, recurring challenges, and approaches that may serve as transferable models. On this basisrelevant committees and stakeholder groups collaborate to define implementation measures for specific objectives. For each agreed Road-to-FAIR building block, concrete recommendations are developed and documented. These recommendations are presented in this wiki as part of a living handbook and are revised as technical environments, community practices, and institutional requirements evolve.
  
-The resulting recommendations are consistently documented using the same guiding questions and a harmonized structureTwo perspectives must therefore be consideredon the one hand, the discussion and agreement on content; on the other, the administrative and technical implementation. Each individual step required for implementation must be examined. The perspectives and roles of the various stakeholders are taken into account to ensure that all influencing factors are considered in detail. In addition, the decision-making processes that lead to established procedures are outlined—both from the bottom up and from the top down.+To support consistency and transparency, all recommendations are documented according to a common structure and a shared set of guiding questions. Their development must take account of two complementary perspectives: first, the substantive discussion and community agreement concerning the intended outcome; and second, the administrative, organizational, and technical measures required for implementation.
  
-This provides a foundation for optimizing the procedures concerning the individuals involvedtheir responsibilities, and the necessary actions. In order for the FAIR approach to be successful, it is essential that identified stakeholders take on specific responsibilities. */+Each step necessary for implementation must therefore be examined individually. The perspectives, responsibilities, and requirements of the relevant stakeholder groups are considered in order to identify dependencies and influencing factors. The processes through which procedures are discussed, agreed upon, and established are also documented, including both bottom-up processes originating within communities and infrastructures and top-down processes arising from institutional strategies and policies. 
 + 
 +This approach provides a basis for clarifying and improving procedures, responsibilities, and required actions. The successful implementation of FAIR practices ultimately depends on the active participation of the identified stakeholders and on their willingness and ability to assume clearly defined responsibilities.
  
  
Line 72: Line 75:
  
 For questions, comments and suggestions, please write to [[hmc-hub-ee@geomar.de|hmc-hub_ee@geomar.de]]. For questions, comments and suggestions, please write to [[hmc-hub-ee@geomar.de|hmc-hub_ee@geomar.de]].
 +
 +====== References ======
 +
 +[1] Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 (2016)
 +
 +[2] Empfehlungen für Richtlinien der Helmholtz-Zentren zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten, 2019, Helmholtz Open Science, https://os.helmholtz.de/open-research-data/forschungsdaten-policies/ doi: doi.org/10.2312/os.helmholtz.002
 +
start.1785847981.txt.gz · Last modified: by esoeding