HMC Home -> HMC Hub Earth & Evironment -> Catalogue of Resources
Go to a collection of other useful resources collected by the hub
Compilation of Recommendations
Details
Short Title
R 8: Document and share the whole process
Source Documnent
Guidelines for publishing structured metadata on the Web V3.0
Source Document Link
https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00066
Publishing Organisation
RDA Research Metadata Schemas WG
Date of Publication
2021-06-15
Topic
Capacity building/ incentivisation
Addressed Stakeholders
data service providers
Keywords
policy, documentation
Text
Documenting the Schema.org implementation process, reasoning, and considerations will help existing and new repository staff understand the implementation in a way that allows for future improvements to be implemented effectively and efficiently. Additionally, the documentation will allow easier identification of potential problem areas and future discussions on community best practice. Metadata schemas are reviewed regularly to ensure that the purpose is meeting expectations, and so this will not only improve processes for one particular research community, but also potentially the larger research community. It is recommended that documentation: Specifies each step as discussed in the Recommendation 1 to 8 wherever applicable, including the supporting schemas and crosswalks implemented (i.e., the use different categories, such as mandatory, recommended, optional) so it is clear what the minimum is and how to go beyond; Provides enough examples (both mapping and implementation), covering common scenarios within the community of use; Includes information such as which repositories are harvesting your data, and if semantic markup was used by those harvesters. These two things will help new implementers in the same community see what a successful implementation looks like from both the home repository, and the harvesting repository, which can be very useful in the grand scheme of technical implementation. Include who a list of adopters of the recommended process especially if the publication process is community-led; Considers publishing and making the documentation findable and accessible to wider communities via the web, so other repository owners can learn, follow or adapt their own approach.